20250513 Workshop on Integration of AIEd features in SLS Module Design_Gamification Survey of 34 out of 80

Question	SD	D	A	SA
Q1: The learning objectives of the lesson were clearly stated and easy to understand.	0	0	26	8
Q2: The lesson content was relevant to giving me the knowledge useful in my work.	0	0	23	11
Q3: The pedagogy and teaching methods used helped me understand the topic better.	0	1	26	7
Q4: I had enough opportunities to participate and ask questions during the lesson.	0	3	22	9
Q5: The teacher(s) explained concepts clearly and effectively.	0	1	22	11
Q6: The learning materials were helpful in understanding the topic.	0	0	19	15
Q7: The lesson was well-paced, giving me enough time to understand the material.	0	4	22	8
Q8: After this lesson, I feel more confident in my understanding of the topic.	0	2	27	5

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19RdiWnI1dBxtEkrVmNszQFNpqB-fbnpvZbhQwOKB_TY/edit?gid=1513045603#gid=1513045603

Key Takeaways:

1. Strong Positive Feedback: Most questions received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a high percentage of respondents selecting 'Agree' (A) or 'Strongly Agree' (SA).
   • Questions 1 and 2 received 100% positive responses, indicating strong agreement that the learning objectives were clear and the content was relevant.
   • Questions 3 and 5 also showed very high positive sentiment (97.06%), suggesting satisfaction with the teaching methods and clarity of explanations.
2. Areas for Potential Improvement: While generally positive, some questions showed a slightly higher number of negative or neutral responses ('Strongly Disagree' or 'Disagree').
   • Question 4, "I had enough opportunities to participate and ask questions during the lesson," had 3 'Disagree' responses, resulting in a lower positive percentage (91.18%) compared to other questions. This suggests that some participants felt limited in their opportunities for interaction.
   • Question 7, "The lesson was well-paced, giving me enough time to understand the material," also had 4 'Disagree' responses, indicating that some participants found the pace challenging.
3. Learning Materials and Confidence: Questions related to learning materials and post-lesson confidence also received strong positive feedback.
   • Question 6, "The learning materials were helpful in understanding the topic," had a high number of 'Agree' and 'Strongly Agree' responses.
   • Question 8, "After this lesson, I feel more confident in my understanding of the topic," also showed a strong positive sentiment, indicating that the lesson was effective in building confidence.

💡 Common Themes from Comments (Q9 / AK)

Theme	Example Phrases	Summary
✅ Appreciation / Positive Sentiment	"Thank you", "Nope, all is good"	Some participants expressed general satisfaction.
🔄 Need for Customization / Subject Relevance	"adapted further for accuracy", "catered to our subject branch"	Several noted the need to tailor tools to specific subjects or contexts.
🧭 Time & Support Requirements	"Need more time to explore", "some help desk features"	Participants mentioned needing more time or technical support to implement what they learned.

Thematic Summary Of Q9 Comments

                        Theme  Mentions

1                 Appreciation        12

3  Suggestions for Improvement         6

2               Support Needed         3

0                Customization         2

 

Here’s the thematic summary of the comments from Q9 (column AK), with positive themes clearly emerging:

🌟 Emphasized Positive Insights

• Appreciation (12 mentions) – Many participants expressed gratitude and found the session helpful, insightful, or informative.

• Positive tone was dominant even when paired with suggestions.

🔧 Constructive Themes

• Suggestions for Improvement (6) – Ideas to refine format or make sessions more subject-specific.

• Support Needed (3) – Indicating a desire for more time or technical assistance.

• Customization (2) – Comments about tailoring tools to fit specific subject needs.

Raw Comments

For MTL, the tools and resources will need to be adapted further for accuracy.

Thank you

Nil

nil

nil

probably some help desk features

Nope, all is good.

Need more time to explore and apply to our work context.

Perhaps instead of a mass workshop across different subjects, have something that is more catered to a smaller scale and to our subject branch?

nil

nil

For a user who did not have experience in creating SLS lessons, I was lost at some parts. However, good to learn the AI tools that will come SLS way.

More AI experimentation

Very comprehensive learning content prepared that would require further exploration.

nil

Thank you for the course and giving us with helpful tips to create resources and navigate SLS.

other AIEd features on SLS

Na

From IPS (FIdah and Li Wen)

Would be good to have user guides

Arrangement of tables and chairs were inappropriate for the frontal teaching. Some participants had their backs facing the screen. Frontal teaching was too fast and not easy to keep up.

Great workshop and very detailed and helpful.

The second session was particularly useful. Thank you!

.

Thank you, Lawrence, for demonstrating how the design of interactives have exponentially advanced and the potential for resource development.

I think the learning experiences are very valuable, but it is a little bit fast paced. Perhaps give a bit more time to the hands-on experience!

all good, NIL

Perhaps can arrange for more charging points or extension cables so every table can have access to sufficient battery to last the entire workshop.

instructors may need to slow down to let us try it out

Step by step guide on using the various tools were useful for self-exploration after the course.

Thank you team!

Thanks for sharing how AI tools can help us create simple games - this is refreshing!