An Analysis of the Singapore People's Party (SPP): Performance and Developments (2015-2025)
1. Executive Summary
This report provides an expert analysis of the Singapore People's Party (SPP) over the decade spanning approximately 2015 to 2025. During this period, the SPP navigated a significant transition following the parliamentary departure of its founder, Chiam See Tong, and his wife, Lina Loh (Lina Chiam). The party experienced considerable leadership flux, with Lina Loh leading into GE2015, followed by a renewal attempt with Steve Chia and Jose Raymond for GE2020, and subsequent changes leading to the current leadership under Melvyn Chiu (Chairman) and Steve Chia (Secretary-General). Electorally, the SPP focused its efforts primarily on Potong Pasir SMC and Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, contesting fewer seats compared to its historical participation. Despite marginal improvements in vote share in GE2020 compared to GE2015, the party failed to secure parliamentary representation, reflecting the significant challenges faced by smaller opposition parties in Singapore's PAP-dominant political system. SPP's policy platforms consistently addressed national anxieties concerning cost of living, job security (particularly regarding foreign competition, leading to calls for a review of the India-Singapore CECA), and retirement adequacy, proposing measures like GST freezes, surplus distribution via vouchers, and minimum/living wage policies. However, its influence remained limited due to its lack of parliamentary presence and difficulty differentiating itself from larger opposition parties like the Workers' Party (WP) and Progress Singapore Party (PSP). Key challenges included electoral defeats, leadership instability, resource constraints, and the enduring, potentially constraining, legacy of its founder. The party's primary achievement was its resilience in maintaining a political presence and offering voters an alternative, albeit limited, choice. Its outlook hinges on its performance in GE2025 and its ability to overcome persistent organizational and political hurdles.
2. Introduction
The Singapore People's Party (SPP) represents one of the established opposition parties operating within Singapore's unique political landscape, characterized by the long-standing dominance of the People's Action Party (PAP).1 Founded on 21 November 1994 by Sin Kek Tong and members who split from the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) following internal disputes, the SPP gained prominence when veteran politician Chiam See Tong assumed leadership in December 1996.9 Chiam's subsequent victory in Potong Pasir Single Member Constituency (SMC) under the SPP banner cemented the party's identity and provided it with parliamentary representation for multiple terms.9 The SPP positioned itself as a "moderate" opposition force aiming to provide constructive criticism and uphold democratic principles.10
This report aims to provide an expert analysis of the SPP's performance, key developments, successes, and challenges over the past decade, roughly covering the period from 2015 to 2025. This timeframe is significant as it largely represents the post-Chiam See Tong era in terms of active parliamentary participation, forcing the party to navigate a future without its iconic leader holding a seat. The analysis focuses on leadership transitions, electoral participation and results in the 2015 and 2020 General Elections (GE2015, GE2020), the context surrounding GE2025, key policy proposals articulated in party manifestos, and the SPP's overall political standing and influence within the broader Singaporean political context.
The assessment is situated within an environment where the PAP has maintained uninterrupted power since 1959, consistently securing supermajorities in Parliament.1 The SPP operates alongside other opposition parties, most notably the Workers' Party (WP), which holds the position of the main opposition in Parliament, and the newer Progress Singapore Party (PSP), which gained traction in GE2020.1 Understanding the dynamics between these parties and the overarching dominance of the PAP is crucial for contextualizing the SPP's activities and impact during the specified period.
3. Leadership Trajectory and Transitions (2015-2025)
The decade from 2015 to 2025 was a period of significant leadership evolution for the Singapore People's Party, defined by the transition away from its founding figures and subsequent efforts, marked by both renewal and instability, to establish a new generation of leaders.
Post-Chiam Era Context
The period under review commences after Chiam See Tong's departure from Parliament in 2011 and the conclusion of his wife, Lina Loh Woon Lee (commonly known as Lina Chiam)'s term as a Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) from 2011 to 2015.9 This context is crucial, as the party entered this decade grappling with the challenge of maintaining relevance and electoral competitiveness without its most recognizable figure holding a parliamentary seat.
Lina Loh's Leadership Role (Chairwoman until 2019)
Lina Loh served as the party's Chairwoman from 2012 11 and led the SPP into the GE2015 campaign.3 She personally contested the Potong Pasir SMC, the seat long held by her husband, seeking to reclaim it for the party.17 However, in October/November 2019, both Lina Loh and Chiam See Tong stepped down from their respective leadership positions – Chairwoman and Secretary-General – citing Chiam's declining health.9 Despite stepping down as Chairwoman, Lina Loh remained involved in the party's leadership, subsequently holding the position of Vice-Chairperson in the Central Executive Committee (CEC).9
Emergence of Steve Chia and Jose Raymond (2019-2020)
The departure of the Chiams precipitated a significant leadership renewal in November 2019. Steve Chia Kiah Hong was elected as the new Secretary-General, succeeding Chiam See Tong after his 23-year tenure.9 Concurrently, Jose Raymond was elected as the party's Chairman, taking over from Lina Loh.9
Steve Chia brought prior political experience to the role, having served as Secretary-General of the National Solidarity Party (NSP) from 2001 to 2005 and as an NCMP from 2001 to 2006 after contesting under the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) banner.9 He joined the SPP in 2018 23 and subsequently led the party into the GE2020 campaign.4
Jose Raymond represented a different profile, having previously served as Press Secretary to PAP minister Vivian Balakrishnan and as Chief Executive of the Singapore Environment Council.9 He joined the SPP in January 2018 9 and quickly rose to the Chairmanship. He contested Potong Pasir SMC in GE2020, becoming a prominent face for the party during that election.26
Post-GE2020 Changes and Current Leadership
The period following GE2020 saw further leadership adjustments. In December 2020, barely six months after contesting Potong Pasir, Jose Raymond announced his retirement from politics to concentrate on his business ventures.9 This departure led to then Vice-Chairman Williiamson Lee stepping in as Acting Chairman.9 It was also revealed that the Assistant Secretary-General, Ariffin Sha, had resigned from the party in August 2020.9 As per the latest available CEC structure information, this position remained vacant.9
In January 2021, the SPP CEC formally accepted the resignations of Raymond and Sha and co-opted two new members: Melvyn Chiu and Khan Osman Sulaiman.9 Melvyn Chiu subsequently assumed the role of Chairman.9 The current leadership team preparing for GE2025 thus includes Melvyn Chiu (Chairman), Steve Chia (Secretary-General), Lina Loh (Vice-Chairperson), and Williiamson Lee (Treasurer).9
Implications of Leadership Dynamics
The period from 2019 to 2021 was characterized by notable leadership volatility. The simultaneous departure of the Chiams marked the end of an era, while the subsequent election of Chia and Raymond signaled a deliberate attempt at renewal. However, Raymond's relatively swift exit from politics after a high-profile GE2020 campaign, coupled with the resignation of the Assistant Secretary-General, points towards potential underlying challenges in leadership retention and stability within the SPP. This rapid turnover contrasts sharply with the decades of stability under Chiam See Tong's leadership and raises questions about the party's capacity to build and sustain leadership momentum in the demanding environment of opposition politics. Factors contributing to this flux could range from internal party dynamics to the significant personal and professional costs often associated with opposition involvement in Singapore.
The current leadership structure represents an attempt to stabilize the party by blending individuals with different backgrounds and tenures. Steve Chia offers prior parliamentary (NCMP) experience and leadership roles in another party.9 Williiamson Lee, described as a member for nearly two decades 10, provides continuity. Melvyn Chiu's rise from co-option to Chairman signifies internal promotion.9 Lina Loh's continued presence as Vice-Chairperson maintains a tangible link to the party's historical legacy.9 This combination appears aimed at leveraging past experience while integrating newer figures after the recent period of change.
Furthermore, the extended vacancy in the Assistant Secretary-General position, following Ariffin Sha's resignation in August 2020 9, suggests potential difficulties in the party's leadership pipeline. The inability to fill this key role for a prolonged period could indicate a limited pool of individuals willing or able to commit to such a demanding position within a small opposition party, or perhaps challenges in achieving internal consensus on a suitable candidate. This points towards possible constraints in organizational capacity and leadership regeneration.
4. Electoral Footprint: GE2015 and GE2020
During the 2015-2025 decade, the Singapore People's Party maintained its presence in the electoral arena but faced significant challenges in translating participation into parliamentary seats. Its strategy appeared to involve concentrating resources on a limited number of constituencies, primarily its historical stronghold of Potong Pasir SMC and the adjacent Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC.9 Despite these focused efforts, the party did not win any seats in either GE2015 or GE2020.3
GE2015 Performance
Led by then-Chairwoman Lina Loh 3, the SPP contested four constituencies in GE2015, fielding a total of eight candidates.3 These were:
Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC (5-member): The SPP team, which included members from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) such as Benjamin Pwee under a joint banner 9, secured 26.41% of the vote against the PAP team led by Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen, which garnered 73.59%.18
Hong Kah North SMC: Candidate Ravi Philemon obtained 25.24% against the PAP incumbent Amy Khor's 74.76%.9
Mountbatten SMC: Candidate Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss, formerly of the NSP 9, received 28.0% of the vote 18 against PAP incumbent Lim Biow Chuan's 71.86%.18
Potong Pasir SMC: Lina Loh (Lina Chiam) garnered 33.61% against the PAP's Sitoh Yih Pin, who won decisively with 66.39%.17 This result marked a substantial decline from her near-win in GE2011, where she secured 49.64% of the vote.16
Overall, across the seats it contested, the SPP obtained 27.08% of the votes.18 Its share of the total national vote was 2.17%.4 GE2015 was characterized by a significant nationwide swing in favour of the ruling PAP, which achieved a national vote share of 69.9%.2 This "SG50 effect," possibly influenced by national jubilee celebrations and the passing of founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew 17, negatively impacted the performance of most opposition parties, including the SPP, whose vote share in contested seats dropped significantly compared to GE2011.9
GE2020 Performance
Under the new leadership of Secretary-General Steve Chia 4, the SPP contested fewer constituencies in GE2020, fielding five candidates across two divisions 4:
Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC (4-member): The SPP team, comprising Steve Chia, Melvyn Chiu, Williiamson Lee, and Osman Sulaiman, secured 32.77% of the vote against the PAP team's 67.23%.9 This result represented an improvement of over 6 percentage points compared to the party's performance in the same GRC in GE2015.
Potong Pasir SMC: Candidate Jose Raymond obtained 39.33% of the vote against the PAP's Sitoh Yih Pin, who retained the seat with 60.67%.26 This was also an improvement of nearly 6 percentage points over Lina Chiam's 2015 result but remained well below the threshold needed to win.
Across the two constituencies contested, the SPP garnered 33.9% of the votes cast.9 Its share of the total national vote was 1.52%.9 GE2020 witnessed a national swing against the PAP, whose overall vote share decreased to 61.24%.4 While the SPP saw improvements in its contested wards, the primary beneficiaries of this national swing were the Workers' Party (WP), which won a second GRC (Sengkang), and the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), which secured two NCMP seats through strong performances in several constituencies.1
SPP General Election Performance (2015 & 2020)
Sources: 17
Analysis of Electoral Strategy and Performance
The SPP's electoral footprint over these two elections reveals a strategic concentration of limited resources. The reduction in contested seats from eight in 2015 to five in 2020 likely reflects pragmatic considerations regarding manpower and funding, challenges common to smaller opposition parties in Singapore.5 The continued focus on Potong Pasir taps into the party's historical roots and the enduring, though diminishing, resonance of the Chiam legacy.9 The consistent challenge in the neighbouring Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC suggests an attempt to build a sustained presence in an adjacent area, possibly hoping for spillover effects or aiming to cultivate long-term support.9
While the SPP achieved modest percentage gains in its contested wards during GE2020, coinciding with a national anti-PAP swing, it failed to translate this into the more substantial breakthroughs seen by the WP and PSP.1 This suggests that factors beyond mere policy alignment or national mood swings influence electoral outcomes in specific constituencies. The strength of PAP incumbents (like Ng Eng Hen in Bishan-Toa Payoh until his retirement before GE2025 24, and Sitoh Yih Pin consolidating his position in Potong Pasir 17), candidate recognition, campaign machinery, and perceived party credibility likely played significant roles.8 SPP's inability to capitalize more effectively on the GE2020 sentiment points to potential limitations in these areas compared to its larger opposition counterparts.
The persistent, almost obligatory, focus on Potong Pasir underscores the complex legacy of Chiam See Tong. While the name recognition provides a foundation, the repeated losses since his departure suggest this legacy might also act as a constraint, potentially diverting resources and attention from other areas where the party might theoretically have better prospects. The party appears caught between honouring its past and forging a viable path forward in a constituency where the incumbent PAP candidate has steadily increased his margin since 2011.17
5. Policy Platform and Advocacy (Focus on GE2015, GE2020, GE2025)
The Singapore People's Party's policy proposals and campaign messages during the 2015-2025 period consistently revolved around core issues affecting Singaporeans' daily lives, particularly economic pressures and job security, while also advocating for greater government accountability.
GE2015 Approach
In the GE2015 campaign, led by Lina Loh, the SPP's messaging, as articulated in its party political broadcast, focused on the difficulties faced by ordinary Singaporeans.21 Key concerns highlighted included:
Cost of Living and Retirement: General anxieties about the ease of life and retirement adequacy, suggesting a need for more government support.21
Transport Reliability: Criticisms of frequent public transport breakdowns despite significant investment.21
Job Security: Concerns about competition from foreign professionals and the perceived insecurity faced by local graduates and workers.21 The party specifically called for the minimum qualifying salary for the Employment Pass (EP) to be raised significantly from the then-$3,300 level, arguing it was too low to ensure the quality of foreign professionals.21
Government Accountability: Positioning itself as a necessary check on the PAP government, highlighting perceived half-hearted responses to public concerns and referencing past accounting lapses in ministries.21
Party Track Record: Emphasizing the SPP's historical management of the Potong Pasir Town Council under Chiam See Tong, citing fiscal prudence and delivery of amenities without government grants as evidence of competence and integrity.21
Lina Loh, leveraging her NCMP experience (2011-2015), aimed to continue the Chiam legacy while speaking up on these national issues.13 The overall platform sought to portray the SPP as attuned to the struggles of ordinary citizens and capable of responsible governance and parliamentary scrutiny.
GE2020 and GE2025 Manifestos
The SPP presented more detailed manifestos for the GE2020 ("A Better Tomorrow") and GE2025 ("It Is Time") elections.4 While the full GE2025 manifesto details require accessing the linked document 10, available summaries and reports highlight key policy themes and proposals, many carrying over or evolving from 2020 to 2025 10:
Economic Stability & Fairness / Cost of Living:
GST Freeze: Proposing a halt to Goods and Services Tax (GST) increases until the cumulative budget deficit surpasses 3% of government revenue for three consecutive years.26 This directly challenges the PAP government's recent GST hike from 7% to 9%.46
Surplus Distribution: Advocating for annual distribution of government budget surpluses directly to citizens via CDC (Community Development Council) vouchers, with larger amounts for lower-income households.26 This contrasts with the PAP's approach of channeling surpluses primarily into national reserves.26
Progressive Taxation: Calling for increased income tax on the top 2% of earners and the reintroduction of estate duty for ultra-high-net-worth individuals to fund relief measures.26
Living Wage / Minimum Wage: Proposing the implementation of a living wage policy to ensure low-income workers can meet basic needs and advocating for a minimum wage to ensure "dignity of living".42 The specific wage amount proposed by SPP is not detailed in the provided sources, unlike proposals from other parties like WP or PSP.46
Employment & Job Security:
Fair Employment Laws: Calling for the codification of Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) guidelines into law, mandating fair hiring practices and retrenchment benefits.42 This aligns with broader calls for stronger anti-discrimination measures.47
CECA Review: Explicitly demanding a reassessment of the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) "to address labour inflow concerns".26 This policy targets anxieties about foreign professionals competing for PMET (professionals, managers, executives, and technicians) jobs.26 Background information on CECA indicates it facilitates trade in goods and services, including movement of professionals, and has undergone previous reviews.48
Foreign Worker Quotas: Advocating for a gradual reduction of S Pass and Employment Pass quotas and dependency ratios, particularly in sectors deemed "automatable".26
Local Hiring: Proposing stricter enforcement of local hiring quotas, potentially linked to a raised Local Qualifying Salary (LQS), and offering tax incentives for businesses that prioritize hiring Singaporean PMETs.42
Retirement Age: Calling for the abolition of the statutory retirement age (currently 63) and suggesting tax incentives for companies hiring seniors above 70 who wish to continue working.42 This aligns with policies aimed at supporting older workers.43
Public Transport:
MRT Maintenance & Reliability: Proposing heavy investment in MRT maintenance to ensure reliability and prevent major disruptions, citing a specific recent incident at Braddell MRT station as a concern.26
Housing:
Singles' Eligibility: Proposing to lower the eligibility age for single citizens to buy new HDB flats from 35 to 30.42
Governance:
Balanced Budget: Advocating for a policy where government expenditure generally matches revenue, with surpluses returned to the people rather than accumulated in reserves.26
Reserve Transparency: Questioning the transparency surrounding Singapore's national reserves and proposing a Freedom of Information Act to allow for greater scrutiny.26
Education:
Financial Literacy: Suggesting the inclusion of fundamental financial skills (saving, budgeting) in the primary and secondary school curriculum.43
Class Size & Teacher Workload: Advocating for smaller teacher-student ratios and reducing teachers' administrative burdens to allow greater focus on classroom instruction.43
Analysis of Policy Directions
The SPP's policy platform across GE2015, GE2020, and GE2025 demonstrates a consistent focus on the economic anxieties of Singaporeans. Issues of cost of living, job competition (particularly concerning foreign labour), and transport reliability form the core of their message.21 This focus aligns the SPP with the broader concerns voiced by the electorate and other opposition parties.43 By proposing concrete, though sometimes controversial, measures like a GST freeze, surplus redistribution, minimum wage, and a CECA review, the SPP attempts to present itself as a party offering tangible solutions to these pressing problems.
The call to review CECA 26 stands out as a policy tapping directly into nationalist and protectionist sentiments regarding foreign labour competition, a recurring and sensitive theme in Singaporean politics. While potentially resonating with certain segments worried about PMET job displacement, it positions the party against the PAP's generally open economic policies and requires careful articulation to avoid perceptions of xenophobia.
Furthermore, the party's proposals regarding fiscal policy – advocating for balanced budgets, annual surplus distribution, and greater reserve transparency 26 – represent a challenge to the PAP's long-held principles of fiscal conservatism and reserve accumulation.60 This positions the SPP as offering a fundamentally different approach to national financial management, prioritizing immediate citizen relief over long-term saving, and demanding greater accountability in governance. The overlap with policy proposals from other opposition parties, however, presents a challenge for SPP in establishing a distinct political identity based solely on its platform.43
6. Achievements and Contributions (Perceived "Good Things")
Despite operating in a challenging political environment and facing consistent electoral setbacks over the past decade, the Singapore People's Party has made certain contributions and achieved relative successes.
Sustained Political Presence and Voter Choice: The SPP's most evident achievement is its persistence. By consistently participating in General Elections (GE2015, GE2020, and preparing for GE2025), the party has ensured that voters in the constituencies it contests have an alternative to the ruling PAP.3 This continued presence, even without winning seats, contributes incrementally to political discourse and provides a platform for alternative viewpoints, upholding a basic tenet of democratic competition.52
Focus on Key Wards and Community Connection: By concentrating its limited resources primarily on Potong Pasir SMC and Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, the SPP has been able to maintain a degree of continuous engagement in these areas across multiple election cycles.9 This sustained focus allows the party to build familiarity with local issues and residents, fostering a connection, however localized.10
Relative Electoral Improvements in GE2020: While falling short of victory, the SPP demonstrated improved performance in GE2020 compared to GE2015 in its contested wards. Jose Raymond's campaign in Potong Pasir secured 39.33% of the vote, a respectable showing against a PAP incumbent who had significantly strengthened his hold in 2015.26 Similarly, the Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC team, led by Steve Chia, increased the party's vote share by over 6 percentage points from the previous election.9 These gains, achieved under new leadership, suggest some capacity to connect with voter sentiment.
Policy Advocacy on Relevant Issues: Through its manifestos and campaign platforms, the SPP has consistently raised issues pertinent to public concerns, such as the rising cost of living, job security, transport reliability, and retirement adequacy.21 Steve Chia highlighted his past advocacy for the pioneer generation during his time as an NCMP (2001-2006) as an example of the party contributing policy ideas.26 Lina Chiam also utilized her NCMP platform (2011-2015) to voice concerns in Parliament.21 While direct causal links between SPP advocacy and specific PAP policy shifts are difficult to establish from the provided material (unlike claims made by the WP 46), the party contributes to the national conversation on these key topics.
Attempted Leadership Renewal: The leadership transition in 2019, which saw Steve Chia and Jose Raymond take the helm, represented a conscious effort by the party to move into the post-Chiam era and inject new energy.9 Although subsequent stability proved elusive, this transition itself was a necessary step in the party's evolution.
In essence, the SPP's main achievement during this period lies in its resilience. In the face of consistent electoral defeats 9, leadership turnover 9, and the inherent resource disadvantages faced by opposition parties in Singapore 5, the SPP's continued ability to organize, field candidates, formulate policy proposals 26, and maintain a presence demonstrates organizational tenacity. This persistence itself serves a function within the political system by offering voters a choice and maintaining pressure, however slight, on the incumbent. The improved vote shares in GE2020, while insufficient for victory, also suggest that the party, under its renewed leadership at the time, managed to resonate somewhat more effectively with voters in its target constituencies compared to the challenging GE2015 cycle.
7. Challenges and Setbacks (Perceived "Not So Good Things")
The Singapore People's Party faced numerous significant challenges and setbacks during the 2015-2025 decade, hindering its ability to gain electoral traction and exert political influence.
Consistent Electoral Defeats: The most significant challenge was the party's inability to win any parliamentary seats in both GE2015 and GE2020.3 The GE2015 results were particularly damaging, with Lina Chiam losing Potong Pasir by a much larger margin (33.61% vs 66.39%) compared to her narrow loss in GE2011 (49.64% vs 50.36%).17 While GE2020 saw improvements, the party remained far from victory in its contested seats.29
Leadership Instability: The party experienced considerable leadership churn. The retirement of Chiam See Tong and Lina Loh from the top posts in 2019 marked a major transition.9 This was followed relatively quickly by the departure of the newly elected Chairman Jose Raymond in December 2020 and Assistant Secretary-General Ariffin Sha in August 2020.9 Such instability at the top can disrupt strategic planning, undermine morale, and negatively impact public perception of the party's coherence and viability. The prolonged vacancy in the Assistant Secretary-General role further points to potential difficulties in leadership recruitment and succession planning.9
Limited National Reach and Impact: By contesting only four constituencies (8 seats) in GE2015 and two constituencies (5 seats) in GE2020, the SPP's potential national impact was inherently limited.4 This resulted in very low shares of the overall national vote – 2.17% in GE2015 and 1.52% in GE2020.4 This narrow focus restricts its ability to build a broad base of support or influence national discourse significantly outside of election periods.
Resource Constraints: Like many smaller opposition parties in Singapore, the SPP likely operates with significant constraints on financial and human resources compared to the PAP.5 This can impact campaign activities, policy research capabilities, and the ability to attract and retain talent. The need to form a joint slate with the DPP for the Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC contest in GE2015 might also reflect resource limitations.9
Struggle for Differentiation: While the SPP's policy platform addresses key public concerns, many of its core themes (cost of living, jobs, housing) and even specific proposals (minimum wage, fair employment practices) overlap considerably with those of other opposition parties like the WP, PSP, and SDP.26 This makes it challenging for the SPP to carve out a unique political identity and convince voters why they should choose SPP over other opposition alternatives, particularly the larger and more established WP or the high-profile PSP.
The Chiam Legacy's Shadow: While a source of historical identity, the enduring association with Chiam See Tong, especially in Potong Pasir, may inadvertently hinder the party's ability to adapt and potentially shift strategic focus away from the former stronghold, despite repeated losses there post-2011.17
Systemic Disadvantages: The SPP, like all opposition parties in Singapore, operates within a political system that presents inherent challenges. These include the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) system, a media landscape often seen as favouring the incumbent, short official campaign periods, and the potential use of laws like the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) or the Foreign Interference (Counter-Measures) Act (FICA) against political opponents and critics, which can create a chilling effect.5 While specific actions mentioned in snippets targeted other parties or activists 61, these broader systemic factors create a difficult operating environment for the SPP.
Past Controversies of Leadership: Although predating the 2015-2025 period, past personal controversies involving current Secretary-General Steve Chia (a nude photo scandal in 2003 and a driving incident in 2006) 23 could potentially influence public perception during his leadership, even if no new major controversies involving the party itself emerged during this specific decade beyond the leadership changes.
The interplay between electoral defeats and leadership instability suggests a potentially detrimental cycle for the SPP. Lack of success at the ballot box can understandably lead to disillusionment or necessitate personal/professional reprioritization among leaders (as cited by Jose Raymond 32), resulting in departures. This turnover, in turn, can weaken the party's organizational capacity and public image, making future electoral success even more challenging to achieve.
Furthermore, the SPP's struggle to gain significant ground even during GE2020, a period marked by a noticeable national swing against the PAP 4, highlights deeper challenges. While the party improved its vote share in contested wards, it did not experience the breakthroughs achieved by the WP (winning Sengkang GRC) or the PSP (securing NCMP seats).1 This suggests that factors beyond simply aligning policies with public sentiment are crucial for electoral success. Elements such as established party machinery, perceived governing credibility 8, candidate appeal, historical parliamentary track record (WP's advantage), or the presence of high-profile figures (like PSP's Tan Cheng Bock) may be areas where the SPP finds itself at a comparative disadvantage relative to larger opposition forces.
8. Influence and Public Perception (2015-2025)
The Singapore People's Party's influence on national politics and its public perception over the past decade have been shaped primarily by its lack of parliamentary representation and its historical legacy.
Limited Direct Influence: Since Lina Loh's NCMP term ended in 2015 9, the SPP has had no elected or non-constituency members in Parliament. Consequently, its direct ability to shape legislation, participate in parliamentary debates, or hold the government formally accountable through parliamentary mechanisms has been non-existent during this period. The party's influence has been primarily confined to the electoral sphere – providing a choice in contested constituencies – and attempting to shape public discourse through its manifestos, campaign activities, and media statements.21
Position within the Opposition Landscape: The SPP is generally regarded as one of Singapore's smaller opposition parties. It operates in the shadow of the Workers' Party (WP), which holds multiple seats and is formally recognized as the main opposition 1, and more recently, the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), led by the prominent former PAP MP Tan Cheng Bock, which secured NCMP seats in GE2020.1 Having withdrawn from the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) prior to this period 9, the SPP has contested elections independently, further distinguishing it from alliance-based opposition groups.
Public Perception and Legacy: Public perception of the SPP remains strongly tied to its founder, Chiam See Tong, and its historical association with Potong Pasir SMC.9 This legacy is a double-edged sword: it provides a degree of name recognition and historical significance but may also limit perceptions of the party's current relevance or broader appeal beyond that specific context. In the wards it actively contests (Potong Pasir and Bishan-Toa Payoh), public perception is most directly reflected in the electoral results achieved.18 The GE2020 campaign of Jose Raymond in Potong Pasir generated some public and media interest due to his background and relatively strong performance.27 Similarly, Steve Chia's leadership brings his own political history, including his previous NCMP term and past controversies, into the public eye.23
Media Coverage: As a smaller party without parliamentary seats, the SPP generally receives less media coverage compared to the PAP, WP, and PSP. Media attention tends to peak during election cycles or when significant internal events occur, such as leadership changes or manifesto launches [General observation].
The SPP's position in the political landscape appears largely defined by its past rather than its present impact. Despite leadership changes and efforts to contest constituencies beyond Potong Pasir, the narrative often defaults back to the Chiam era.17 This strong historical anchor, while providing a base identity, makes it difficult for the party to project a distinct, forward-looking vision capable of capturing broader public imagination or appealing significantly beyond its traditional areas of focus.
However, the party's influence may be more indirect. By consistently contesting specific wards, even without winning, the SPP forces the PAP to allocate resources and campaign actively in those areas.17 Furthermore, by adding its voice to the chorus raising concerns about cost of living, job security, and governance 21, the SPP contributes, alongside other opposition parties, to the overall political pressure on the incumbent. This pressure may subtly influence the PAP's policy agenda or public communications over time, representing the incremental but valuable role that persistent smaller parties can play in a dominant-party system, even in the absence of direct electoral success.
9. Pivotal Moments (2015-2025)
Several key events and periods marked the trajectory of the Singapore People's Party during the decade from 2015 to 2025:
GE2015 Campaign and Outcome: This election was pivotal as it tested the party's strength in Potong Pasir without Chiam See Tong contesting the seat directly. Lina Loh's campaign aimed to carry the legacy but resulted in a decisive loss (33.61% vote share), significantly down from 2011, amidst a strong national swing towards the PAP.17 The party also contested Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC with a joint slate including DPP members.9 The overall poor showing reflected a challenging election for the opposition nationwide.
Leadership Transition (2019): The stepping down of both Chiam See Tong as Secretary-General (due to health) and Lina Loh as Chairwoman marked the definitive end of the founding leadership era.9 The subsequent election of Steve Chia as Secretary-General and Jose Raymond as Chairman represented a significant attempt at renewal and charting a new course for the party.9
GE2020 Campaign: This was the first general election contested under the new leadership duo of Chia and Raymond.4 The party focused its resources on just two constituencies: Potong Pasir SMC and Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC.9 Jose Raymond's contest in Potong Pasir drew attention, and his 39.33% vote share was seen as a credible, albeit losing, performance.26 The team in Bishan-Toa Payoh also managed to improve the party's vote share compared to 2015.9 The launch of the party's manifesto, "A Better Tomorrow," outlined its policy positions for that election.4
Post-GE2020 Leadership Changes (2020-2021): The period immediately following GE2020 saw unexpected leadership instability. Chairman Jose Raymond announced his retirement from politics in December 2020.9 It was also revealed that Assistant Secretary-General Ariffin Sha had resigned earlier in August 2020.9 These departures necessitated further adjustments, with Williiamson Lee becoming Acting Chairman and Melvyn Chiu later being co-opted and eventually appointed Chairman.9
GE2025 Preparations: Leading up to the May 3, 2025 General Election, the SPP launched its manifesto titled "It Is Time" on April 19, 2025.10 Key proposals focused on economic relief (GST freeze, surplus distribution via CDC vouchers), job security (CECA review), and transport reliability.26 The party confirmed it would again contest Potong Pasir SMC (with candidate Williiamson Lee) and Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC (led by Secretary-General Steve Chia).10 Steve Chia publicly expressed optimism about the party's chances in Bishan-Toa Payoh, citing the retirement of PAP heavyweight Ng Eng Hen from the constituency.25 The party also faced the prospect of a three-cornered contest in Potong Pasir.12
These moments collectively illustrate a decade of transition, challenge, and persistence for the SPP as it sought to redefine itself and maintain relevance in Singapore's competitive political landscape following the departure of its founding leader from active politics.
10. Conclusion: Balanced Assessment and Outlook
The Singapore People's Party's journey through the decade from 2015 to 2025 has been one defined by adaptation in the post-Chiam See Tong era, marked by persistent electoral challenges, significant leadership transitions, and a consistent focus on the socio-economic concerns of Singaporeans. The party demonstrated resilience by continuing to participate in the political process, fielding candidates, and developing policy platforms despite facing considerable obstacles inherent in Singapore's dominant-party system.4 Its ability to maintain a presence, particularly in its historical focal point of Potong Pasir and the neighbouring Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, and to achieve marginal improvements in vote share during GE2020, count as relative successes.9 The party's policy advocacy, centred on issues like cost of living, job security, and government accountability, ensured it contributed, albeit modestly, to the national discourse.21
However, the SPP faced profound challenges that significantly limited its impact. The consistent failure to secure parliamentary representation in GE2015 and GE2020 remains its most significant shortcoming.9 This lack of electoral success was compounded by periods of leadership instability, particularly following GE2020, which saw the departure of key figures elected in the 2019 renewal effort.9 Operating with likely limited resources and struggling to differentiate its policy platform significantly from larger opposition parties like the WP and PSP further constrained its ability to expand its appeal or capitalize effectively on national swings against the ruling PAP.4 The enduring legacy of Chiam See Tong, while providing historical identity, also appeared to tether the party strategically, particularly to Potong Pasir.17
Assessing the SPP's performance against its probable objectives reveals a mixed picture. It succeeded in maintaining its existence as a political entity and offering voters an alternative voice in the constituencies it contested. However, it failed in the primary objective of winning parliamentary seats and struggled to exert significant influence on policy or capture a substantial share of the national vote. Its influence remained largely indirect, contributing to the overall opposition presence rather than achieving direct political power.
Looking ahead post-GE2025, the SPP remains a minor but persistent player in Singapore's political landscape. Led by experienced figures like Secretary-General Steve Chia 9, the party faces an uphill battle for relevance and electoral success. Its immediate future hinges critically on its performance in Potong Pasir and Bishan-Toa Payoh in the GE2025 election. Sustaining or improving its vote share, particularly in Bishan-Toa Payoh following the departure of the PAP's anchor minister 25, would be crucial indicators of its viability. Long-term prospects depend on the party's ability to achieve leadership stability, effectively differentiate itself within the opposition field, attract resources and talent, and potentially adapt its strategy beyond its traditional focus areas.
The experience of the Singapore People's Party over the last decade serves as a case study illustrating the complex challenges confronting smaller opposition parties in Singapore. Navigating the transition from a founding leader, managing scarce resources, competing against a deeply entrenched incumbent, differentiating oneself in a crowded opposition space, and maintaining organizational coherence amidst electoral setbacks are formidable hurdles. The SPP's continued existence is a testament to the commitment of its members, but its path towards greater political influence remains arduous.
Works cited
2025 Singaporean general election - Wikipedia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Singaporean_general_election
Singapore slide - New Mandala, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.newmandala.org/singapore-slide/
2015 Singaporean general election - Wikipedia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Singaporean_general_election
2020 Singaporean general election - Wikipedia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Singaporean_general_election
Rabbits or rebels? Making sense of Singapore's 2015 elections - Brookings Institution, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/rabbits-or-rebels-making-sense-of-singapores-2015-elections/
Singapore election: All about the lived economy | Lowy Institute, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/singapore-election-all-about-lived-economy
Singapore's Political Economy: Two Paradoxes, accessed May 1, 2025, https://knowledge.csc.gov.sg/ethos-issue-06/singapores-political-economy-two-paradoxes/
EXPLAINING ELECTIONS IN SINGAPORE: DOMINANT PARTY RESILIENCE AND VALENCE POLITICS | Journal of East Asian Studies - Cambridge University Press, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-east-asian-studies/article/explaining-elections-in-singapore-dominant-party-resilience-and-valence-politics/B4313DB214400AF11ED31DC80F673611
Singapore People's Party - Wikipedia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_People%27s_Party
Singapore People's Party, accessed May 1, 2025, https://singaporepeoplesparty.org/
Singapore People's Party is formed - NLB, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=ff0bf607-2ca6-4b74-9ced-c82b995a12ae
GE2025: SPP confirms candidates for Potong Pasir, Bishan-Toa Payoh ahead of Nomination Day | The Straits Times, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/ge2025-singapore-peoples-party-williamson-lee-to-contest-potong-pasir-smc
GE2015: On the campaign trail with Singapore People's Party's Lina Chiam, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/ge2015-on-the-campaign-trail-with-singapore-peoples-partys-lina-chiam
Singapore's Pandemic Election: Opposition Parties and Valence Politics in GE2020 - Pacific Affairs - The University of British Columbia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://pacificaffairs.ubc.ca/perspectives/singapores-pandemic-election-opposition-parties-and-valence-politics-in-ge2020/
GE2020: PAP wins with 61.24% of vote; WP claims two GRCs including new Sengkang GRC - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2020-general-election-final-result-pap-wp-952471
Lina Loh - Wikipedia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Loh
GE2015: PAP vote share increases to 69.9%, party wins 83 of 89 seats including WP-held Punggol East | The Straits Times, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/ge2015-pap-vote-share-increases-to-699-party-wins-83-of-89-seats-including-wp-held-punggol
General Election 2015: Live and real-time election results | The Straits Times - Graphics, accessed May 1, 2025, https://graphics.straitstimes.com/STI/STIMEDIA/Interactives/singapore-general-election/2015-live-election-results/index.html
ELD | 2015 Parliamentary General Election Results - Elections Department Singapore, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.eld.gov.sg/elections_past_parliamentary2015.html
GE2015: Lina Chiam speaks at SPP rally in Mountbatten, Sep 6 - YouTube, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNtxFBYbvjQ
GE2015: Party political broadcast by the Singapore People's Party aired on Sept 3, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/ge2015-party-political-broadcast-by-the-singapore-peoples-party-aired-on-sept-3
SPP elects Steve Chia, Jose Raymond to top posts - Singapore - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/spp-elects-steve-chia-secretary-general-jose-raymond-chairman-847571
Steve Chia - Wikipedia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Chia
GE2025: Singapore People's Party confirms slate for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, including 2 new faces - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-spp-bishan-toa-payoh-5078206
GE2025: SPP optimistic about chances in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, after Ng Eng Hen's retirement from politics - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-spp-ng-eng-hen-steve-chia-bishan-toa-payoh-5078751
SPP launches manifesto, proposes distributing government surpluses as CDC vouchers, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/ge2025-spp-launches-manifesto-proposes-distributing-government-surpluses-as-cdc-vouchers
Mothership : SPP Chairman Jose Raymond : we need to see the value that everyone brings to the table, regardless of party - NLB eResources, accessed May 1, 2025, https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/webarchives/details/mothership.sg.2020.06.spp-chairman-jose-raymond-we-need-to-see-the-value-that-everyone-brings-to-the-table-regardless-of-party.html
GE2025: With a large number of multi-cornered fights on the cards, will this play into PAP's hands? - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/ge2025-state-play-opposition-multi-cornered-5056881
GE2025: SPP to field party treasurer Williiamson Lee in Potong Pasir SMC - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-spp-potong-pasir-5078201
Singapore election 2025: SPP launches manifesto, proposes distributing government surpluses as CDC vouchers - The Business Times, accessed May 1, 2025, https://absolwenci1989.pl/rzgq/sv/21293906-alejandra-quiroz-only-free.html
GE2025: Demographic shifts, three-way race put Potong Pasir in the spotlight, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/ge2025-demographic-shifts-three-way-race-put-potong-pasir-in-the-spotlight
SPP chairman Jose Raymond retires from politics to focus on his business, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/spp-chairman-jose-raymond-retires-from-politics-to-focus-on-his-business
SPP launches manifesto, chief Steve Chia to lead Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC team - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/watch/spp-launches-manifesto-chief-steve-chia-lead-bishan-toa-payoh-grc-team-5075866
The Rebounding of the People's Action Party of Singapore in 2015: An Electoral Analysis of Three Hotly Contested Constituencies - Brill, accessed May 1, 2025, https://brill.com/view/journals/aisr/17/2/article-p177_9.pdf
New Normal Or Anomaly? - 2015 General Election and PAP's Electoral Landslide - Academia | SG, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.academia.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Lam-2015-New-Normal.pdf
ELD | 2020 Parliamentary General Election Results - Elections Department Singapore, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.eld.gov.sg/finalresults2020.html
GE2025: Who's contesting where, at a glance - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-nomination-day-who-contest-where-grc-smc-parliament-5080186
PAP vote share falls to 61.24% in GE2020 - NLB eResources, accessed May 1, 2025, https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/webarchives/details/mothership.sg.2020.07.ge2020-pap-vote-share.html
GE2020 official results: PAP retains West Coast GRC with 51.69% of votes against Tan Cheng Bock's PSP | The Straits Times, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/ge2020-sample-count-results-pap-leads-with-52-of-votes-in-west-coast-grc-against-tan-cheng
Manifesto 2025 - Singapore People's Party, accessed May 1, 2025, https://singaporepeoplesparty.org/manifesto2025/
GE2025: No plans to raid the reserves, says SPP's Steve Chia - YouTube, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CVkFe-ONps
GE2025: Singapore People's Party unveils manifesto calling for minimum wage, CECA review and reducing NS - CNA, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-singapore-peoples-party-spp-manifesto-5074416
What is each Singaporean party promising you this election? - NLB eResources, accessed May 1, 2025, https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/webarchives/details/thekopi.co.2020.07.05.ge2020-manifestos-all.html
Review of #PAP and #SPP Manifestos (Excerpts) complete version 2, accessed May 1, 2025, https://weelookang.blogspot.com/2025/04/review-of-pap-and-spp-manifestos.html
GE2025: Foreign influence? Thanks, but no thanks: SPP - YouTube, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKsd6ei4cog
Policies and promises: comparing GE 2025 party manifestos - Jom, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.jom.media/policies-and-promises-comparing-ge-2025-party-manifestos/
Working for Singapore: The Workers' Party Manifesto 2025, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.wp.sg/manifesto
India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement - NLB, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=cce04a3d-c8ba-418c-91ea-dc0b619ac001
Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement between The Republic of India and the Republic of Singapore (CECA) - Indian Trade Portal, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.indiantradeportal.in/vs.jsp?lang=0&id=0,959,10581,28177,28186
GE2025: Singapore People's Party unveils manifesto calling for minimum wage, CECA review - YouTube, accessed May 1, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HD9XCVovQCQ
WP'S GE2015 POLITICAL BROADCAST, SEP 3 - YouTube, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xr0G8gQTgGg
IPS Post-Election Conference 2015 By Johannis Aziz, IPS Research Fellow, Debbie Soon, IPS Research Associate, and Tan Min-Wei - National University of Singapore, accessed May 1, 2025, https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/novenews_1_pec15_report_1711152.pdf
GE2020: Progress Singapore Party unveils manifesto, campaign slogan - YouTube, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daqY7fgie_k
Singapore GE2020: PM Lee Hsien Loong's full speech at launch of PAP manifesto, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/singapore-ge2020-pm-lee-hsien-loongs-full-speech-at-launch-of-pap-manifesto
GE2020 Manifesto by Progress Singapore Party : For Country For People - PSP, accessed May 1, 2025, https://psp.org.sg/ge2020-manifesto-by-progress-singapore-party-for-country-for-people/
PSP-Manifesto-2025.pdf, accessed May 1, 2025, https://psp.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/PSP-Manifesto-2025.pdf
WP manifesto charts what it sees as working for Singapore | The Straits Times, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/wp-manifesto-charts-what-it-means-to-be-working-for-singapore
Our Party's Manifesto - Peoples Power Party, accessed May 1, 2025, https://peoplespowerparty.sg/our-partys-manifesto/
The Workers Party Manifesto 2020 - AWS, accessed May 1, 2025, https://d3bnzwrhehvhbjiwmja.s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/The+Workers+Party+Manifesto+2020.pdf
Singapore GE2020: PAP manifesto Our Lives, Our Jobs, Our Future summed up in 10 parts, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/singapore-ge2020-pap-manifesto-our-lives-our-jobs-our-future-summed-up-in-10-parts
World Report 2025: Singapore - Human Rights Watch, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/singapore
Full article: Podcasting Politics in Singapore: Hegemony, Resistance, and Digital Media, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14672715.2025.2451755
No comments:
Post a Comment